J Cosmet Med 2021; 5(1): 30-35
Published online June 30, 2021
Preamjit Saonanon, MD1 , Krit Rattanakit, MD2 , Patnapa Vejanurug, MD3 , Apichaya Thanyavuthi, MD4
1Department of Ophthalmology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
2Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
3Institute of Dermatology, Department of Medical Services, Ministry of Public Health, Bangkok, Thailand
4Department of Dermatology, Siriraj Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
Correspondence to :
Krit Rattanakit
E-mail: crazykittyk@gmail.com
© Korean Society of Korean Cosmetic Surgery & Medicine
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Background: Aging in the lower eyelids creates bags under the eyes from the protruding orbital fat, and periorbital wrinkles. Therefore, lower blepharoplasty should be combined with a skin tightening procedure to enhance the results.
Objective: To compare the effects between lower blepharoplasty combined with an insulated microneedle radiofrequency (RF) device and lower blepharoplasty alone.
Methods: Twelve Asian (24 eyes) patients with baggy eyelids were included. One eye per patient was randomized for lower blepharoplasty combined with insulated microneedle RF devices (RF group), and the other eye for lower blepharoplasty alone (LB group). All patients underwent transconjunctival lower blepharoplasty with fat transposition and orbicularis oculi suspension. The primary outcome was the difference between both groups on the five-point Wrinkle Assessment Scale (WAS), assessed at baseline and at 2 months post-surgery. The secondary outcome was patient satisfaction using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS).
Results: The WAS improvements were 75.0% (9/12 eyes) and 58.3% (7/12 eyes) in the RF and LB groups, respectively. The GAIS showed high patient satisfaction in both groups, with an average of 4.12 (3-5) in the RF group and 4.0 (2-5) in the LB group (p=0.157). There was no difference in the postoperative inflammation between both eyes at 1 week; and no decrease in the WAS score at 2 months or any adverse effects at 6 months were observed.
Conclusion: Wrinkle improvement was observed post-lower blepharoplasty with or without microneedle RF treatment. The insulated microneedle RF device proved safe when performed concurrently with lower blepharoplasty.
Keywords: blepharoplasty, cosmetic techniques, needles, radiofrequency therapy, randomized controlled trial, skin aging
J Cosmet Med 2021; 5(1): 30-35
Published online June 30, 2021 https://doi.org/10.25056/JCM.2021.5.1.30
Copyright © Korean Society of Korean Cosmetic Surgery & Medicine.
Preamjit Saonanon, MD1 , Krit Rattanakit, MD2 , Patnapa Vejanurug, MD3 , Apichaya Thanyavuthi, MD4
1Department of Ophthalmology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
2Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
3Institute of Dermatology, Department of Medical Services, Ministry of Public Health, Bangkok, Thailand
4Department of Dermatology, Siriraj Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
Correspondence to:Krit Rattanakit
E-mail: crazykittyk@gmail.com
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Background: Aging in the lower eyelids creates bags under the eyes from the protruding orbital fat, and periorbital wrinkles. Therefore, lower blepharoplasty should be combined with a skin tightening procedure to enhance the results.
Objective: To compare the effects between lower blepharoplasty combined with an insulated microneedle radiofrequency (RF) device and lower blepharoplasty alone.
Methods: Twelve Asian (24 eyes) patients with baggy eyelids were included. One eye per patient was randomized for lower blepharoplasty combined with insulated microneedle RF devices (RF group), and the other eye for lower blepharoplasty alone (LB group). All patients underwent transconjunctival lower blepharoplasty with fat transposition and orbicularis oculi suspension. The primary outcome was the difference between both groups on the five-point Wrinkle Assessment Scale (WAS), assessed at baseline and at 2 months post-surgery. The secondary outcome was patient satisfaction using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS).
Results: The WAS improvements were 75.0% (9/12 eyes) and 58.3% (7/12 eyes) in the RF and LB groups, respectively. The GAIS showed high patient satisfaction in both groups, with an average of 4.12 (3-5) in the RF group and 4.0 (2-5) in the LB group (p=0.157). There was no difference in the postoperative inflammation between both eyes at 1 week; and no decrease in the WAS score at 2 months or any adverse effects at 6 months were observed.
Conclusion: Wrinkle improvement was observed post-lower blepharoplasty with or without microneedle RF treatment. The insulated microneedle RF device proved safe when performed concurrently with lower blepharoplasty.
Keywords: blepharoplasty, cosmetic techniques, needles, radiofrequency therapy, randomized controlled trial, skin aging
Emmaline Ashley, MBBChBAO (Hons), MCh (Hons), BA (1st), PgDipAes, ProfCertDerm, Anika Parmar, BDS, BSc, Shonnelly Novintan, MBBS, BSc, MRCS (Eng), Lara Watson, BM, BSc (Hons), BMedSci, MRCS (Eng), BDS (Hons), Priyanka Chadha, MBBS (Lond), BSc (Hons), DPMSA (Lond), MRCS (Eng), MSc (Lond)
J Cosmet Med 2024; 8(1): 34-40 https://doi.org/10.25056/JCM.2024.8.1.34Cheuk Hung Lee, MBBS (HK), FHKAM (MED), FHKCP, MScPD (Cardiff), MRCP (UK), DPD (Wales), DipDerm (Glasgow), PGDipClinDerm (London), MRCP (London), GradDipDerm (NUS), DipMed (CUHK), Kar Wai Alvin Lee, MBChB (CUHK), DCH (Sydney), Dip Derm (Glasgow), MScClinDerm (Cardiff), MScPD (Cardiff), DipMed (CUHK), DCH (Sydney), Lisa Kwin Wah Chan, MBChB (CUHK), MScPD (Cardiff), PgDipPD (Cardiff), PGDipClinDerm (Lond), DipMed (CUHK), DCH (Sydney), Kar Fai Victor Lee, MBBS (UCL, University of London), MRCP (UK), FRCP (Glasgow), FHKCP, FHKAM (Medicine)
J Cosmet Med 2023; 7(1): 1-5 https://doi.org/10.25056/JCM.2023.7.1.1Cheuk Hung Lee, MBBS (HK), FHKAM (MED), FHKCP, MScPD (Cardiff), MRCP (UK), DPD (Wales), DipDerm (Glasgow), PGDipClinDerm (London), MRCP (London), GradDipDerm (NUS), DipMed (CUHK), Kar Wai Alvin Lee, MBChB (CUHK), DCH (Sydney), Dip Derm (Glasgow), MScClinDerm (Cardiff), MScPD (Cardiff), DipMed (CUHK), DCH (Sydney), Kwin Wah Chan, MBChB (CUHK), MScPD (Cardiff), PgDipPD (Cardiff), PGDipClinDerm (Lond), DipMed (CUHK), DCH (Sydney), Kar Fai Victor Lee, MBBS, MRCP (UK), FRCP (Glasgow), FHKCP, FHKAM (Medicine), Kar Wai Phoebe Lam, MBCHB (OTAGO), MRCS (EDIN), MSCPD (CARDIFF)
J Cosmet Med 2022; 6(2): 67-71 https://doi.org/10.25056/JCM.2022.6.2.67