Tin Hau Sky Wong, MBBS, MRCSEd, MScPD, MScAPS1,2
1Medaes Medical Centre, Hong Kong, 2Medaes Medical Clinic, Hong Kong
Correspondence to :
Tin Hau Sky Wong
E-mail: drskywong@gmail.com
© Korean Society of Korean Cosmetic Surgery & Medicine
Background: Injectable fillers are common and useful tools in aesthetic medicine for reconditioning, restoring, or recontouring the quality and structure of the corresponding skin and body parts. Various choices with different properties are available, each unique and with its own advantages and disadvantages, which result in diverse indications and applications. Moreover, improper use of fillers also leads to complications and drawbacks. Awareness of the risks and management of the adverse effects are important and brief ideas of those injectables are essential.
Objective: This article provides a brief revision and summary of the common injectable fillers in terms of properties, functions, complications, and management.
Methods: Peer-reviewed articles published from 1984 to 2017 were identified from PubMed and Google Scholar, and qualitatively reviewed with respect to concurrent common injectable materials.
Results and conclusion: Knowledge of different injectables are important for proper application in different indications and safety of use. This article gives a brief revision.
Keywords: aesthetics, biofilm, dermal filler, hyaluronate sodium, injectables, intradermal injections
An injectable filler by definition is a biocompatible material that is commonly injected in the cutaneous, subcutaneous, and periosteal layers for re-volumization of the respective areas to achieve the reconditioning, restoration, or recontouring of the quality and structure of the corresponding skin and body part. Injectable fillers are regarded as medical devices. They were first used in lipodystrophy to improve body appearance and avoid social stigmatization [1]. Patients were highly satisfied [2]; therefore, it is further widely adopted in the aesthetic field at fast paces. The properties of an ideal soft tissue filler are biocompatibility, nonallergenic, integrative to soft tissues, easy to administer, good plasticity and elasticity, adequate G-prime value, long-lasting, low-cost, and non-migratory. However, none of the fillers have all these properties, so a combination of fillers in a coherent approach with good knowledge of the fillers is of utmost importance to achieve an optimal effect.
Peer-reviewed articles published from 1984 to 2017 were identified from PubMed and Google Scholar, and qualitatively reviewed with respect to concurrent common injectable materials.
Numerous soft tissue fillers are available worldwide, among which the most commonly used are as follows (Table 1) [3-12].
Table 1 . Comparisons of the different aspects of the commonly used fillers
Variable | HA | CaHA | PLA | PCL | CMC | Autologus fat injection |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Property | Organic, linear polysaccharide, a family of GAGs, naturally found in human skin | Inorganic, naturally found in human teeth and bone | Organic, polymer form of lactic acid | Organic, aliphatic polyester | Organic, non-cross-linked cellulose derivative | Organic, own tissue |
Biodegradable | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Manufacturing and processing | Bacterial bioengineering | Inorganic bioceramic synthesis | Can be derived from starch | Ring opening polymerization | Etherification cellulose | Liposuction, filtering, centrifugation, and ASC enhancement |
Metabolism | Hydrolysis | Biodegraded to calcium and phosphate and then removed through phagocytosis | Biodegraded to carbon dioxide and water | Biodegraded to carbon dioxide and water | Biodegraded to carbon dioxide and water | As normal fat |
Longevity | Variable, depending on the molecular size and cross-linking, from weeks to 2 years | 12–18 months, variable for the induced collagen | Up to 3 years, variable for the induced collagen | From 1 to 4 years, depending on the length of the polymer | No clinical data for injectables | 20%–90% survival rate of up to 3–6 years |
Preferred level of injection | From the intradermal to the subcutaneous layer and the periosteum | Mostly preferable from the subcutaneous layer to the periosteum | Mostly preferable from the subcutaneous layer to the periosteum | Mostly preferable from the subcutaneous layer to the periosteum | From the subcutaneous layer to the periosteum, together with the primary filler | Subcutaneous and deep fasciae |
Hypersensitivity and allergic reaction | Allergic reaction rate of approximately 1%–3% | No epidemiological data | No epidemiological data | No epidemiological data | No epidemiological data, but anaphylaxis was reported [11] | Autologous transfer principally does not have allergic reaction |
Occurs as multiple erythema, cystic nodules, granulomatous reaction, etc. [3,4] | A study showed almost no foreign body reaction, maybe some mild inflammation but resolving quickly [5-7] | No hypersensitivity reported for injected PLA, but allergic reaction cases were reported for orthopedic PLLA screw [8] and granuloma formation [12] | Granuloma reaction reported [9], but scientific research showed no effect on the systemic functions of the immune system [10] |
HA, hyaluronic acid; CaHA, calcium hydroxylapatite; PLA, poly lactic acid; PCL, polycaprolactone; CMC, carboxymethylcellulose; GAG, glycosaminoglycan; ASC, adipose-derived stem cell; PLLA, poly-L-lactic acid.
Hyaluronic acid (HA) is a temporary filler under the family of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), which is found abundantly in the skin as an extracellular matrix of various molecular sizes. It is negatively charged and binds to water molecules. It provides numerous biological functions such as structural support, nutrient diffusion, cell migration, and proliferation. It is metabolized by hydrolysis facilitated by hyaluronidase. Pharmaceutical manufacturing of HA uses biochemical engineering by the fermentation of bacteria such as
Calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA) is a non-pyrogenic biocompatible inorganic bioceramic synthesized through chemical deposition, biomimetic deposition, the sol-gel route (wet-chemical precipitation), or electrodeposition [14]. It is usually available in a semi-solid state in the form of 25- to 45-µm-diameter microspheres in a suspension of a gel carrier with carboxymethylcellulose (CMC). It is biodegradable in the same metabolic pathway as that of the human bone and is removed by phagocytosis. Apart from being a filler and biostimulator, CaHA provides support and a scaffold lattice that guides fibroblast ingrowth for neocollagenesis and promotes surrounding soft tissue formation. It can provide different functional properties, G-primes, and viscosities by varying the degree of hyperdilution. Therefore, it can be used in different areas and indications ranging from filler effects (i.e., tissue augmentation and re-volumization) to biostimulator effects (i.e., collagen induction and rejuvenation) [15,16]. The longevity of CaHA is generally 12–18 months [17], but hyperdilution may shorten its shelf life and may require a greater number of injections. It is approved by the FDA for moderate to severe wrinkles and folds (nasolabial folds), facial augmentation, and hand rejuvenation.
Poly lactic acid (PLA) is a polymer of lactic acid from the alpha-hydroxy acid family, which can be derived from starch and is commercially prepared in L-enantiomer (poly-L-lactic acid [PLLA]) or racemic form. It is biocompatible, biodegradable, and fully metabolized to carbon dioxide and water. The PLA microparticles (40–63 μm in size in some pharmaceutical preparations) initiate neocollagenesis as a result of the activation of fibroblasts [18]. It is reconstituted in sterile water with lignocaine and then injected in the skin and soft tissue. Reconstitution at least 24 hours (optimal 72 hours) before use is recommended [19], although the protocol differs in different preparations. Post-injection massage is controversial, but studies showed that the incidence of nodule formation as a complication was reduced when the rule of 5 (post-injection for 5 days, 5 times a day, 5 minutes each time) was followed [20]. The shelf life of PLA ranges from 25 months [21] to 3 years [22]. PLA has been approved by the FDA for restoration and correction of the signs of facial fat loss, nasolabial folds, and other facial wrinkles.
Polycaprolactone (PCL) is an organic aliphatic polyester belonging to the poly-α-hydroxy acid group. It is hydrolytically degradable into carbon dioxide and water [23] and is bioresorbable. Investigations have also shown that it is non-cytotoxic, non-pyrogenic, and biocompatible. Its biostimulator effect induces collagen formation, which results in a filling effect. Similar to CaHA, it also provides a scaffold for tissue infiltration, which facilitates soft tissue building. It is prepared in a suspension of CMC for adequate texture and immediate effect after injection. PCLs are delivered as microspheres of 25- to 50-µm in size in some pharmaceutical preparations. The longevity of PCL depends on the extensiveness of the polymer chain, from 1 to 4 years. Before injection, PCL can be mixed with lignocaine for the comfort of the patient during injection. Its parental PCL medical devices (e.g., suture materials) are FDA approved, but not the current injectable PCL itself, although some studies, including randomized controlled trials, demonstrated its efficacy and safety [24].
CMC is a non-cross-linked cellulose derivative that forms a bioabsorbable gel with water, which provides an immediate filler effect and structural support to tissues. It is not usually administered alone but as a suspension and texture modifier mixed with other filler materials, commonly CaHA and PCL. It allows these primary materials enough time to exert their biostimulatory effect to produce collagen, which fills up the site of interest before the CMC degrades and is resorbed. The rate of resorption of CMC depends on the molecular size [25], but no clinical data have been reported in the literature.
Autologous fat has been used as a filler since a century ago. Despite being perfectly compatible, adipocyte survival rate, which directly affects the outcome and longevity, is the chief concern. The uptake rate can be anywhere from 20% to 90% [26]. Therefore, patient selection, harvesting technique, processing, and transfer injection are particularly important. For underweight patients, the outcome may include a poor quality and low amount of fat; therefore, a nourishing diet may be required before the procedure is performed. During harvesting, low heat and trauma at favorable quality sites are required to ensure that good-quality adipocytes are collected without damaging them. Adipose-derived stem cells have been shown to have improved uptake and can be prepared using special techniques by isolating the stromal vascular fraction, which provides better neovascularization for fat survival [27].
Fillers are regarded as medical devices in Hong Kong. No compulsory regulation or legislation has been established for mandating product registration. However, choosing a registered product guarantees better quality and safety profiles.
Since the structure of the skin, body compartments, and vital structures, including the nerves and vessels, are complicated, only well-trained aesthetic doctors are allowed to perform the procedure. Complications range from mild (e.g., bruising and bleeding) to severe (e.g., vascular insultation, nerve injection, and infection) [28]. Even a small amount of filler, as little as 0.085 ml, can induce disastrous arterial embolism consequence [29]. Moreover, incorrect reconstitution, uneven product distribution in the suspension, and improper injection techniques all contribute to undesirable outcomes, nodule formation, and other complications. Therefore, comprehensive training in both theory and skills is important. Among all the fillers, only HA has a counteracting dissolution agent, hyaluronidase. The others are non-dissolvable and must wait for natural biodegradation or surgical correction once the unpleasant filling effect is established. Early intralesional administration of normal saline or corticosteroids can be useful [12], but injection site unevenness or even atrophy may result.
Biofilm formation is one of the most important (though rare) but underdiagnosed conditions associated with the use of filler injections. It is sometimes misdiagnosed as hypersensitive reactions or missed because of subtle presentation and negative culture results [30]. It has an extensive extracellular matrix that is devoid of the immune attack of the body and antibiotic functions. It forms a self-sustaining “ecosystem” that can last for an extremely long period. It can mimic hypersensitive reactions, which occur in 0.02% of the total cases [31]. Management of such conditions includes a high index of suspicion and administration of hyaluronidase for hydrolysis of HA [32] and long-term high-dose broad-spectrum antibiotics. Surgical removal or excision away from the filler may be required if the above-mentioned strategies fail. As prevention is always better than cure, meticulous aseptic techniques are required. Complications occur more commonly with longer use of fillers and will resolve after removal of the filler.
Fillers are useful devices for reconditioning, restoring, and recontouring of the skin and body parts. They not only improve one’s appearance but also prevents psychological problems by improving self-confidence or avoiding stigmatization. A wide range of filler selection is available in the market, with different properties, and adequate indication and combination of fillers provide the best outcome. Training for knowledge and techniques is required to prevent both trivial and disastrous morbidity and perhaps mortality.
The author has nothing to disclose.
J Cosmet Med 2020; 4(1): 7-11
Published online June 30, 2020 https://doi.org/10.25056/JCM.2020.4.1.7
Copyright © Korean Society of Korean Cosmetic Surgery & Medicine.
Tin Hau Sky Wong, MBBS, MRCSEd, MScPD, MScAPS1,2
1Medaes Medical Centre, Hong Kong, 2Medaes Medical Clinic, Hong Kong
Correspondence to:Tin Hau Sky Wong
E-mail: drskywong@gmail.com
Background: Injectable fillers are common and useful tools in aesthetic medicine for reconditioning, restoring, or recontouring the quality and structure of the corresponding skin and body parts. Various choices with different properties are available, each unique and with its own advantages and disadvantages, which result in diverse indications and applications. Moreover, improper use of fillers also leads to complications and drawbacks. Awareness of the risks and management of the adverse effects are important and brief ideas of those injectables are essential.
Objective: This article provides a brief revision and summary of the common injectable fillers in terms of properties, functions, complications, and management.
Methods: Peer-reviewed articles published from 1984 to 2017 were identified from PubMed and Google Scholar, and qualitatively reviewed with respect to concurrent common injectable materials.
Results and conclusion: Knowledge of different injectables are important for proper application in different indications and safety of use. This article gives a brief revision.
Keywords: aesthetics, biofilm, dermal filler, hyaluronate sodium, injectables, intradermal injections
An injectable filler by definition is a biocompatible material that is commonly injected in the cutaneous, subcutaneous, and periosteal layers for re-volumization of the respective areas to achieve the reconditioning, restoration, or recontouring of the quality and structure of the corresponding skin and body part. Injectable fillers are regarded as medical devices. They were first used in lipodystrophy to improve body appearance and avoid social stigmatization [1]. Patients were highly satisfied [2]; therefore, it is further widely adopted in the aesthetic field at fast paces. The properties of an ideal soft tissue filler are biocompatibility, nonallergenic, integrative to soft tissues, easy to administer, good plasticity and elasticity, adequate G-prime value, long-lasting, low-cost, and non-migratory. However, none of the fillers have all these properties, so a combination of fillers in a coherent approach with good knowledge of the fillers is of utmost importance to achieve an optimal effect.
Peer-reviewed articles published from 1984 to 2017 were identified from PubMed and Google Scholar, and qualitatively reviewed with respect to concurrent common injectable materials.
Numerous soft tissue fillers are available worldwide, among which the most commonly used are as follows (Table 1) [3-12].
Table 1 . Comparisons of the different aspects of the commonly used fillers.
Variable | HA | CaHA | PLA | PCL | CMC | Autologus fat injection |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Property | Organic, linear polysaccharide, a family of GAGs, naturally found in human skin | Inorganic, naturally found in human teeth and bone | Organic, polymer form of lactic acid | Organic, aliphatic polyester | Organic, non-cross-linked cellulose derivative | Organic, own tissue |
Biodegradable | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Manufacturing and processing | Bacterial bioengineering | Inorganic bioceramic synthesis | Can be derived from starch | Ring opening polymerization | Etherification cellulose | Liposuction, filtering, centrifugation, and ASC enhancement |
Metabolism | Hydrolysis | Biodegraded to calcium and phosphate and then removed through phagocytosis | Biodegraded to carbon dioxide and water | Biodegraded to carbon dioxide and water | Biodegraded to carbon dioxide and water | As normal fat |
Longevity | Variable, depending on the molecular size and cross-linking, from weeks to 2 years | 12–18 months, variable for the induced collagen | Up to 3 years, variable for the induced collagen | From 1 to 4 years, depending on the length of the polymer | No clinical data for injectables | 20%–90% survival rate of up to 3–6 years |
Preferred level of injection | From the intradermal to the subcutaneous layer and the periosteum | Mostly preferable from the subcutaneous layer to the periosteum | Mostly preferable from the subcutaneous layer to the periosteum | Mostly preferable from the subcutaneous layer to the periosteum | From the subcutaneous layer to the periosteum, together with the primary filler | Subcutaneous and deep fasciae |
Hypersensitivity and allergic reaction | Allergic reaction rate of approximately 1%–3% | No epidemiological data | No epidemiological data | No epidemiological data | No epidemiological data, but anaphylaxis was reported [11] | Autologous transfer principally does not have allergic reaction |
Occurs as multiple erythema, cystic nodules, granulomatous reaction, etc. [3,4] | A study showed almost no foreign body reaction, maybe some mild inflammation but resolving quickly [5-7] | No hypersensitivity reported for injected PLA, but allergic reaction cases were reported for orthopedic PLLA screw [8] and granuloma formation [12] | Granuloma reaction reported [9], but scientific research showed no effect on the systemic functions of the immune system [10] |
HA, hyaluronic acid; CaHA, calcium hydroxylapatite; PLA, poly lactic acid; PCL, polycaprolactone; CMC, carboxymethylcellulose; GAG, glycosaminoglycan; ASC, adipose-derived stem cell; PLLA, poly-L-lactic acid..
Hyaluronic acid (HA) is a temporary filler under the family of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), which is found abundantly in the skin as an extracellular matrix of various molecular sizes. It is negatively charged and binds to water molecules. It provides numerous biological functions such as structural support, nutrient diffusion, cell migration, and proliferation. It is metabolized by hydrolysis facilitated by hyaluronidase. Pharmaceutical manufacturing of HA uses biochemical engineering by the fermentation of bacteria such as
Calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA) is a non-pyrogenic biocompatible inorganic bioceramic synthesized through chemical deposition, biomimetic deposition, the sol-gel route (wet-chemical precipitation), or electrodeposition [14]. It is usually available in a semi-solid state in the form of 25- to 45-µm-diameter microspheres in a suspension of a gel carrier with carboxymethylcellulose (CMC). It is biodegradable in the same metabolic pathway as that of the human bone and is removed by phagocytosis. Apart from being a filler and biostimulator, CaHA provides support and a scaffold lattice that guides fibroblast ingrowth for neocollagenesis and promotes surrounding soft tissue formation. It can provide different functional properties, G-primes, and viscosities by varying the degree of hyperdilution. Therefore, it can be used in different areas and indications ranging from filler effects (i.e., tissue augmentation and re-volumization) to biostimulator effects (i.e., collagen induction and rejuvenation) [15,16]. The longevity of CaHA is generally 12–18 months [17], but hyperdilution may shorten its shelf life and may require a greater number of injections. It is approved by the FDA for moderate to severe wrinkles and folds (nasolabial folds), facial augmentation, and hand rejuvenation.
Poly lactic acid (PLA) is a polymer of lactic acid from the alpha-hydroxy acid family, which can be derived from starch and is commercially prepared in L-enantiomer (poly-L-lactic acid [PLLA]) or racemic form. It is biocompatible, biodegradable, and fully metabolized to carbon dioxide and water. The PLA microparticles (40–63 μm in size in some pharmaceutical preparations) initiate neocollagenesis as a result of the activation of fibroblasts [18]. It is reconstituted in sterile water with lignocaine and then injected in the skin and soft tissue. Reconstitution at least 24 hours (optimal 72 hours) before use is recommended [19], although the protocol differs in different preparations. Post-injection massage is controversial, but studies showed that the incidence of nodule formation as a complication was reduced when the rule of 5 (post-injection for 5 days, 5 times a day, 5 minutes each time) was followed [20]. The shelf life of PLA ranges from 25 months [21] to 3 years [22]. PLA has been approved by the FDA for restoration and correction of the signs of facial fat loss, nasolabial folds, and other facial wrinkles.
Polycaprolactone (PCL) is an organic aliphatic polyester belonging to the poly-α-hydroxy acid group. It is hydrolytically degradable into carbon dioxide and water [23] and is bioresorbable. Investigations have also shown that it is non-cytotoxic, non-pyrogenic, and biocompatible. Its biostimulator effect induces collagen formation, which results in a filling effect. Similar to CaHA, it also provides a scaffold for tissue infiltration, which facilitates soft tissue building. It is prepared in a suspension of CMC for adequate texture and immediate effect after injection. PCLs are delivered as microspheres of 25- to 50-µm in size in some pharmaceutical preparations. The longevity of PCL depends on the extensiveness of the polymer chain, from 1 to 4 years. Before injection, PCL can be mixed with lignocaine for the comfort of the patient during injection. Its parental PCL medical devices (e.g., suture materials) are FDA approved, but not the current injectable PCL itself, although some studies, including randomized controlled trials, demonstrated its efficacy and safety [24].
CMC is a non-cross-linked cellulose derivative that forms a bioabsorbable gel with water, which provides an immediate filler effect and structural support to tissues. It is not usually administered alone but as a suspension and texture modifier mixed with other filler materials, commonly CaHA and PCL. It allows these primary materials enough time to exert their biostimulatory effect to produce collagen, which fills up the site of interest before the CMC degrades and is resorbed. The rate of resorption of CMC depends on the molecular size [25], but no clinical data have been reported in the literature.
Autologous fat has been used as a filler since a century ago. Despite being perfectly compatible, adipocyte survival rate, which directly affects the outcome and longevity, is the chief concern. The uptake rate can be anywhere from 20% to 90% [26]. Therefore, patient selection, harvesting technique, processing, and transfer injection are particularly important. For underweight patients, the outcome may include a poor quality and low amount of fat; therefore, a nourishing diet may be required before the procedure is performed. During harvesting, low heat and trauma at favorable quality sites are required to ensure that good-quality adipocytes are collected without damaging them. Adipose-derived stem cells have been shown to have improved uptake and can be prepared using special techniques by isolating the stromal vascular fraction, which provides better neovascularization for fat survival [27].
Fillers are regarded as medical devices in Hong Kong. No compulsory regulation or legislation has been established for mandating product registration. However, choosing a registered product guarantees better quality and safety profiles.
Since the structure of the skin, body compartments, and vital structures, including the nerves and vessels, are complicated, only well-trained aesthetic doctors are allowed to perform the procedure. Complications range from mild (e.g., bruising and bleeding) to severe (e.g., vascular insultation, nerve injection, and infection) [28]. Even a small amount of filler, as little as 0.085 ml, can induce disastrous arterial embolism consequence [29]. Moreover, incorrect reconstitution, uneven product distribution in the suspension, and improper injection techniques all contribute to undesirable outcomes, nodule formation, and other complications. Therefore, comprehensive training in both theory and skills is important. Among all the fillers, only HA has a counteracting dissolution agent, hyaluronidase. The others are non-dissolvable and must wait for natural biodegradation or surgical correction once the unpleasant filling effect is established. Early intralesional administration of normal saline or corticosteroids can be useful [12], but injection site unevenness or even atrophy may result.
Biofilm formation is one of the most important (though rare) but underdiagnosed conditions associated with the use of filler injections. It is sometimes misdiagnosed as hypersensitive reactions or missed because of subtle presentation and negative culture results [30]. It has an extensive extracellular matrix that is devoid of the immune attack of the body and antibiotic functions. It forms a self-sustaining “ecosystem” that can last for an extremely long period. It can mimic hypersensitive reactions, which occur in 0.02% of the total cases [31]. Management of such conditions includes a high index of suspicion and administration of hyaluronidase for hydrolysis of HA [32] and long-term high-dose broad-spectrum antibiotics. Surgical removal or excision away from the filler may be required if the above-mentioned strategies fail. As prevention is always better than cure, meticulous aseptic techniques are required. Complications occur more commonly with longer use of fillers and will resolve after removal of the filler.
Fillers are useful devices for reconditioning, restoring, and recontouring of the skin and body parts. They not only improve one’s appearance but also prevents psychological problems by improving self-confidence or avoiding stigmatization. A wide range of filler selection is available in the market, with different properties, and adequate indication and combination of fillers provide the best outcome. Training for knowledge and techniques is required to prevent both trivial and disastrous morbidity and perhaps mortality.
The author has nothing to disclose.
Table 1 . Comparisons of the different aspects of the commonly used fillers.
Variable | HA | CaHA | PLA | PCL | CMC | Autologus fat injection |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Property | Organic, linear polysaccharide, a family of GAGs, naturally found in human skin | Inorganic, naturally found in human teeth and bone | Organic, polymer form of lactic acid | Organic, aliphatic polyester | Organic, non-cross-linked cellulose derivative | Organic, own tissue |
Biodegradable | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Manufacturing and processing | Bacterial bioengineering | Inorganic bioceramic synthesis | Can be derived from starch | Ring opening polymerization | Etherification cellulose | Liposuction, filtering, centrifugation, and ASC enhancement |
Metabolism | Hydrolysis | Biodegraded to calcium and phosphate and then removed through phagocytosis | Biodegraded to carbon dioxide and water | Biodegraded to carbon dioxide and water | Biodegraded to carbon dioxide and water | As normal fat |
Longevity | Variable, depending on the molecular size and cross-linking, from weeks to 2 years | 12–18 months, variable for the induced collagen | Up to 3 years, variable for the induced collagen | From 1 to 4 years, depending on the length of the polymer | No clinical data for injectables | 20%–90% survival rate of up to 3–6 years |
Preferred level of injection | From the intradermal to the subcutaneous layer and the periosteum | Mostly preferable from the subcutaneous layer to the periosteum | Mostly preferable from the subcutaneous layer to the periosteum | Mostly preferable from the subcutaneous layer to the periosteum | From the subcutaneous layer to the periosteum, together with the primary filler | Subcutaneous and deep fasciae |
Hypersensitivity and allergic reaction | Allergic reaction rate of approximately 1%–3% | No epidemiological data | No epidemiological data | No epidemiological data | No epidemiological data, but anaphylaxis was reported [11] | Autologous transfer principally does not have allergic reaction |
Occurs as multiple erythema, cystic nodules, granulomatous reaction, etc. [3,4] | A study showed almost no foreign body reaction, maybe some mild inflammation but resolving quickly [5-7] | No hypersensitivity reported for injected PLA, but allergic reaction cases were reported for orthopedic PLLA screw [8] and granuloma formation [12] | Granuloma reaction reported [9], but scientific research showed no effect on the systemic functions of the immune system [10] |
HA, hyaluronic acid; CaHA, calcium hydroxylapatite; PLA, poly lactic acid; PCL, polycaprolactone; CMC, carboxymethylcellulose; GAG, glycosaminoglycan; ASC, adipose-derived stem cell; PLLA, poly-L-lactic acid..
Adibah Hanim Ismail, MD, M.Med (Fam. Med), Muhammad Farhan Abdul Rashid, BSc, Ungku Mohd Shahrin Mohd Zaman, MD, Noor Shahirah Suparji, MSc, Nur Izzati Mohd Shahrol, BSc, Ernieda Md Hatah, PhD, Qi Hao Looi, PhD
J Cosmet Med 2024; 8(1): 8-17 https://doi.org/10.25056/JCM.2024.8.1.8